Showing posts with label cinematography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cinematography. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Topic #2: Character

First of all, apologies for the delay. You wouldn't know it yet, but we actually have a schedule that looks something like this:

John: Monday-Tuesday
Cole: Wednesday-Friday
Jeremy: Saturday-Sunday

So, as you can see, I've missed my deadline, and were it not for Cole's incessant pestering, I probably would have missed it further.

I've been delayed blog-wise due to final bits of color correction on the trailer and getting everything in order for our sound designer, Jordan Fehr, to take a quick look at any mixing and design tweaks necessary before next week. Why next week? Because Glass City Films is going to the Trail Dance Film Festival in Oklahoma, and we're hoping to have a solid version of the trailer and an investor packet to give to potential producers and distributors.


But enough with excuses and awesomeness. This week's topic centers entirely on character development, something that always seems to be lacking in most of the scripts I work on in Chicago as a cinematographer. One of my central edicts for good storytelling is that plot should follow character, not the other way around. I cite the difference between LOST and Heroes as prime examples of the former and the latter: whereas LOST's conspiracy theories and mythology are firmly rooted in the characters and the emotions that drive them to do such things, Heroes's characters seemingly change on a dime because the plot dictates that they must. One minute, someone has to be a villain; the next, that same person will be saving the life of a person who should be strong-willed yet has decided for this string of episodes to be a flip-flopper.

Cue frustration and rant. But I digress.

What drove me to Separation Anxiety, and what ignites me about its writing, is its to-the-core focus on character development, almost at the expense of what would be considered a typical three-act "plot". Bailey, Jess, and Quinn - and Lily and Mr. Palmer, as well - are all complex characters with shades of grey about their major characteristics, all of which are motivated by choices and events in their lives. I look forward to reading Jeremy's ramble on how he crafted those characters, but that is not my job on this film. My business is cinematography, and how to illustrate each character with imagery and lighting.

My favorite shots in the trailer - look for it next week - are those that evoke certain emotions and feelings about a character or a scene, regardless of what is prettier or not. For example, in Jess' initial confrontation with Mr. Palmer, as she goes to leave, her face is lit with a strong, cool side light, to separate her in color and feeling from Mr. Palmer, who is bathed in a more orange, gentle light. It's not to cast judgment, however, but rather to illustrate that, at this point in the story, Mr. Palmer has settled on his thoughts, and Jess is struggling to come to terms with all of it. And we see that in the wear and tear of the image.

The beauty of feature film work, as opposed to short films, is that the length of the project leaves room for a great deal more nuance. Rather than committing to a single style or a single visual arc, multiple arcs can co-exist. Robert Elswit (Magnolia, There Will Be Blood) and the late Conrad Hall (American Beauty, In Cold Blood) are terrific examples of cinematographers who use all the tools in their bag to achieve these multiple arcs. So too is Robert Richardson, who uses a minimum of six film stocks on almost every film he shoots (JFK, The Good Shepherd) because each stock has its own life and character.

For Separation Anxiety, a few thoughts we had discussed: Jess and Quinn's journey through grief can be a subtle transition from cool, flat tones and hard fixtures to more shapely soft light and warm color schemes. Mr. Palmer's rigid manner can be reflected in claustrophobic framings with longer lenses, but can give way later to wider shots that leave room to breathe. Lily and Quinn's relationship, over the course of the film, can start with a strong degree of contrast and morph into a less harsh, high-key low-fill lighting scheme. All within a general visual scheme dictated by the timeline of events: flashbacks are saturated, almost like porcelain dolls, and the present is melancholy, with a bleached, worn look to it. Think of the way memory is toyed with visually in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (my favorite film, but that's for another topic).

Another idea brought up was to keep elements of Bailey and Mr. Palmer's faith life present in the frame. As Mr. Palmer's faith is so tested by the possibility of Bailey having committed suicide, we thought it a nice visual reminder as opposed to a wordy explanation of Mr. Palmer's history with God and with church. In the trailer, there's a simple but effective image through the mirror of Mr. Palmer crying on Bailey's bed. A crucifix plays in the foreground, subtly, and the image is incredibly evocative.

So, that's it for my ramble. Don't want to give away ALL the surprises, do we?

Let's hear your thoughts and comments. Based on your general knowledge of the script, what visuals come to mind? What films best play in your head as using multiple visual paths to tell the same story? Do you prefer the more stylized visuals of, say, a Quentin Tarantino film or a Steven Spielberg film, or the subtle drawings of the Robert Elswits and the Anthony Dod Mantles of the world? (The latter, by the way, recently shot Slumdog Millionaire, and I encourage you all to go see it multiple times.) Have at it!

Read more...

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Topic #1: 'From Stage to Screen'

Before I begin, I realized in the wake of Cole and Jeremy's introductions that I didn't formally introduce myself. What a travesty!

In brief: my name is John Klein, and I'm the producer and director of photography for Separation Anxiety. I work in Chicago mostly as a freelance cinematographer and all-purpose crew member, and have written a few screenplays here and there as well, namely our flagship effort Glass City, on which I also served as cinematographer under director Cole Simon. I am, in all ways, a nerd, a geek, a lover of film and filmmaking in all its forms. I love the melding of the art and the science of movies, and I am blessed beyond words to have been able to do this for a living for close to three years now. It's better than a real job, and it's better than a hobby. It's my life.


Now, a brief word about what is to follow on our blog. Cole, Jeremy and I are avid bloggers, but Glass City Films' first attempt at a blog for Glass City was a bit of a failure. In its wake, we decided that the reasons were (a) a lack of scheduling and upkeep, and (b) a lack of an overarching goal for the blog. What were we trying to achieve with it?

So, with that said, our goal for this blog is not just to give you an insider's perspective on the process of making Separation Anxiety or to offer the usual newsfeeds and needs of this film production, but to give you the chance to see what makes this production unique and to learn about the craft of filmmaking at all levels from people who are, for all intensive purposes, both very professional about our craft and yet still relatively new to several elements of the process.

And, to facilitate more of a regiment about blogging, we're going to have a different topic each week, which the three of us will tackle on a weekly basis - me as a DP and producer, Jeremy as a writer and director, and Cole as an actor and an artist.

Thus, this entry's title...


"From Stage To Screen"

Separation Anxiety began as a script for the stage. Jeremy will talk a great deal about the experience of watching his work being performed, much as Cole will talk about the joy of acting as Bailey in the theatrical production prior to his work in the film version. My only experience with the play itself is in my initial reading of the script, when Cole first sent me Separation Anxiety and said it might make a good movie, something on our low-budget scale that we could pull off in the wake of Glass City's successful production.

I fell in love with the script instantly. As a play, the three "plotlines" of Jess/Mr. Palmer, Quinn/Lily, and the flashbacks were written to take place on three areas of the stage, the latter being center stage to separate Jess and Mr. Palmer's dialogue in Bailey's house from Quinn and Lily's dialogue in the airport. It's a clever conceit - had I seen it, I'd probably talk more about it - but what drew me in was the endlessly quotable lines and the strong attention to character. And, in spite of its dialogue-heavy format, it felt visually exciting. Shots and scenes formed in my head simply from the play script, and in the transition to a screenplay, my first edict to Jeremy was that he find a way to merge the strengths of the stage with the potential of the screen.

The first draft of the screenplay had its flaws - far too much dialogue and a tendency to veer into inaccessible prose - but the opening six pages became a stellar montage of character development and imagery that hooked me from the get-go. So many ideas emerged in that first draft which Jeremy had already thought out from concept to completion - constantly cutting back to Bailey readying himself (for his death? for something else?) in his room, having Bailey's "ghost" interject into flashbacks now and again, sound bridges and images and cross-cutting - that I was overwhelmed with excitement for the next version.

New drafts are on the way, and I'm already giddy with anticipation. But the challenge of bringing this script to the screen is a monumental one, and I've seen so many terrific plays turned into boring and humdrum movies. For example, The History Boys is a wondrous script marred in the film version by an inability to let close-ups and visuals speak for themselves. I hear similar criticisms about Doubt and Frost/Nixon, both Oscar contenders this year. Even book translations (i.e. the first two Harry Potter films, Atonement, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, and countless other adaptations) suffer in the same light: Don't use a paragraph where a sentence will do. In film, visuals sometimes speak volumes where words would have to suffice on the stage. There are greater options for scenery, mise en scene, and even blocking. To wit, the advent of sound in filmmaking made silence all the more effective. Use it.

I've already rambled more than you will probably read for an initial blog entry on any topic, but I look forward to hearing thoughts in the comments below and with Cole and Jeremy's subsequent entries on the subject. Until next week for me, friends!

Regards,
John Klein
Producer/DP, "Separation Anxiety"
www.windycitycamera.com

Read more...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP